112mdillettechcrunch is a term that refers to an article published on the popular technology news website TechCrunch. The article was written by Sarah Lacy and published on May 3rd, 2013. It caused a significant amount of controversy in the technology industry and beyond, and its impact is still being felt today. In this article, we will explore the origins of the article, its content, and its aftermath.

Origins of the Article

Sarah Lacy is a journalist who has covered the technology industry for many years. In 2013, she was the editor-in-chief of the popular technology news website PandoDaily. She was known for her tough, no-nonsense style of reporting, and she had a reputation for not shying away from controversial topics.

On May 3rd, 2013, Lacy published an article on TechCrunch that would change the course of her career and the technology industry as a whole. The article was titled “112M: That’s How Many Women Will Be in the Workforce by 2025; Let’s Make Sure They’re Treated Fairly.” The article discussed the fact that women were underrepresented in the technology industry and argued that this was a problem that needed to be addressed.

Content of the Article

The article began with a startling statistic: “There will be 112 million more women in the workforce by 2025, according to the World Economic Forum. Let that sink in for a minute.” Lacy went on to argue that the technology industry was not doing enough to address the problem of gender inequality, and that this was hurting the industry as a whole.

Lacy pointed out that only 11% of executive positions in the technology industry were held by women, and that only 20% of engineering graduates were women. She argued that this was not just a moral problem, but also a business problem, as companies that were more diverse tended to be more successful.

Lacy also criticized the “bro culture” that she saw in the technology industry. She described a world where men dominated the industry and women were often excluded or marginalized. She argued that this was not just unfair, but also harmful to the industry as a whole.

The article was met with a significant amount of controversy. Many people in the technology industry saw Lacy’s article as an attack on their way of life. They argued that the industry was already merit-based, and that women simply weren’t interested in pursuing careers in technology. Others saw Lacy’s article as a call to action, and argued that the industry needed to do more to promote diversity and inclusion.

Aftermath of the Article

The aftermath of the article was intense. Lacy was subjected to a barrage of criticism from people in the technology industry, many of whom felt that she was attacking their way of life. She received death threats and was forced to cancel a speaking engagement due to safety concerns.

Despite the controversy, Lacy’s article had a significant impact on the technology industry. It helped to shine a spotlight on the issue of gender inequality in the industry, and it led to a greater focus on diversity and inclusion. Many companies in the industry began to take concrete steps to address the problem, such as setting diversity goals and implementing training programs.

Today, the issue of diversity and inclusion in the technology industry is still a contentious one. While progress has been made, there is still a long way to go. Women and people of color are still underrepresented in the industry, and they still face significant challenges when it comes to advancing their careers.

Conclusion

112mdillettechcrunch was a controversial article that sparked a significant amount of debate in the technology industry. While it was met with criticism from some quarters, it also helped to shine a spotlight on the issue of